Search Results for: list

1. Introduction: More Dashboards, Less Understanding As infrastructure grows, dashboards multiply. New services ship with their own metrics. Alerts increase. Logs get longer. Traces get sampled less. On paper, observability improves. In practice, teams often understand the system less than they did before. This is the core problem: scaling infrastructure does not automatically scale observability….

1. Introduction: “We Fixed the Incident” Isn’t the Same as “We Fixed the System” The incident is over. Services are back. Dashboards are green again. A postmortem document is written, action items assigned, and everyone moves on. Then, weeks later, a very similar failure happens again. From the outside, it looks like bad execution. From…

1. Introduction: The System Didn’t Get Worse Overnight Every release feels reasonable on its own. One more feature, one more exception, one more workaround to meet a deadline. Nothing breaks immediately. Metrics stay acceptable. Users don’t complain—yet. Then one day, a small change triggers a disproportionate failure. Something unrelated slows down. A rollback doesn’t fully…

1. Introduction: “Bad Luck” Is Usually a Pattern You Haven’t Measured Yet A workflow fails once, you shrug. It fails twice, you blame the target. It fails in bursts, you blame proxies. And when it keeps happening across different tasks—timeouts here, bans there, random login friction—you start calling it “bad luck.” But the failures aren’t…

1. Introduction: Systems Don’t “Suddenly” Break At 10 tasks, everything feels under control. Dashboards are green, proxy success rates look stable, and automation workflows finish without drama. Then you scale to 100 tasks and the system starts behaving irrationally: latency spikes, retries explode, IP bans cluster, and once-reliable jobs collapse. The uncomfortable question is not…

You promise 24/7 uptime, then reality tests it. A region gets unstable. One carrier has packet loss. A “healthy” pool starts timing out under load. You fail over—and suddenly costs spike because traffic floods premium routes. Next incident, you cut redundancy to save money, and the blast radius gets worse. This is the real pain…

You add a batch of new proxy nodes. They look clean. Latency is good. No blocks yet. The temptation is obvious: push real traffic immediately and get value out of them right away. Sometimes it works. More often, it doesn’t. A few hours or days later, those same nodes start failing faster than expected. Success…

Everything looks fine until both worlds run at the same time. Automation scripts are crawling, posting, syncing, or validating. Human operators open browsers, log in, review pages, and do sensitive actions. The proxy layer is “stable,” the IPs are “clean,” and latency is “acceptable.” Yet weird friction appears. Humans start seeing more captchas and “unusual…

Traffic grows, and the first instinct kicks in: buy more IPs. More capacity, fewer collisions, higher success rates—at least that’s the expectation. For a short while, it works. Metrics improve. Failures spread out. Pressure feels lower. Then growth continues, and the same problems come back. Certain workflows degrade faster than others. High-value actions start failing…

You pay for premium routes. Low-latency paths. Clean residential exits. Stable networks that rarely trigger scrutiny. In theory, these routes are reserved for your most sensitive operations. In reality, they’re constantly busy. Bulk crawlers grab them when other pools are full. Background jobs spill over during traffic spikes. Retries reroute “temporarily” and never switch back….