Weekend Traffic Spikes Hit the Same Microservice Every Time—Is It Really Capacity, or the Way You Route Specific User Actions?

ByYiluProxy

1. Introduction: The Same Service Fails on the Same Pattern

Traffic grows on weekends.
Most services stay fine.

But one microservice struggles every single time:

  • latency jumps
  • queues build up
  • error rate rises

It’s tempting to conclude: “We need more capacity.”

Sometimes you do. But if the same service fails in the same way every weekend, the bigger question is this:
Is it truly overall capacity, or are you routing one popular user action into a single hot path?

Here’s the simple direction. If it’s capacity, scaling should fix it broadly and consistently. If it’s routing, scaling may help briefly, but the hotspot will return because the same action keeps getting funneled to the same place.

This article answers one question: how do you tell which one it is—and what should you log and change to fix it?

2. Why “Capacity” Gets Blamed First

Capacity is easy to understand:

  • more users → more requests
  • more requests → add servers

But when capacity is the true root cause, you usually see:

  • multiple services degrading together
  • overall system saturation signals
  • a lasting improvement after scaling

If only one service repeatedly breaks, and scaling doesn’t permanently fix it, you’re likely dealing with concentration, not pure volume.

3. Weekend Traffic Is Often Different Traffic

3.1 User behavior shifts

Weekends can change the mix:

  • more browsing, less “quick transactions”
  • heavier read/search/feed activity
  • longer sessions
  • more refreshes and pagination

Even if total requests increase only a little, one or two types of actions can spike a lot.

3.2 “The same RPS” can mean a much heavier workload

A feed request might trigger:

  • multiple downstream calls
  • ranking logic
  • cache lookups
  • database reads

So a small increase in “feed refresh” actions can crush one service while total RPS still looks reasonable.

4. Hotspot vs Capacity: Quick Signs

4.1 Only certain endpoints get slow

Look at latency and errors by endpoint or operation:

  • If only a few endpoints degrade, it’s usually a hot path issue.
  • If everything degrades, capacity is more likely.

4.2 Scaling helps briefly, then the service fails again

That pattern usually means:

  • extra instances buy you time
  • the same action is still routed to the same bottleneck
  • the bottleneck hits its limit again

You are scaling the symptom, not removing the hotspot.

4.3 The microservice scales, but a dependency does not

Even if the service can scale horizontally, a fixed dependency might not:

  • one database table or index
  • one shard
  • one external API limit
  • one shared cache cluster

If routing funnels weekend actions into that dependency, the same microservice will “fail first” every time.

5. What You Should Log and Compare

To avoid guessing, compare weekday vs weekend. You want to answer: “Which actions changed?”

5.1 Action mix

Log or derive:

  • operation name (search, feed, checkout, login, etc.)
  • endpoint
  • request attributes that change routing (region, user type, feature flag)

Then compare:

  • count per action
  • share of total traffic per action

5.2 Routing decisions

For each request (or sampled):

  • which routing rule applied (version/hash)
  • chosen backend/service path
  • chosen shard/partition
  • whether fallback was used

If weekend traffic routes differently, you will see it here.

5.3 Cost signals

Track per action:

  • downstream call count
  • DB query count and duration
  • cache hit rate
  • payload size
  • queue wait time

Hot paths show up as “higher cost per request,” not only higher volume.

6. Common Routing Patterns That Create Weekend Hot Paths

6.1 “All heavy reads go through one service”

Search/feed/recommendation systems are classic weekend hotspots because browsing is bursty.

6.2 Feature flags or experiments concentrate traffic

A weekend-heavy user segment might be in the same experiment bucket, sending them to the same code path or dependency.

6.3 Fallback logic turns a small issue into a hotspot

When something degrades slightly:

  • fallback triggers
  • traffic shifts to fewer routes
  • the fallback target becomes overloaded
  • the system spirals

This often appears only under peak load.

7. Fixes That Work Without Guessing

7.1 Route by “cost,” not just by user count

Not all actions are equal. If an operation is expensive:

  • isolate it
  • spread it across more resources
  • apply stricter rate limits

7.2 Isolate known hot actions

For heavy actions:

  • dedicated queue
  • dedicated workers
  • separate autoscaling policy
  • separate dependency pools when possible

This stops one weekend behavior from taking down everything else.

7.3 Make “action-level” dashboards your default

Track:

  • RPS by action
  • latency by action
  • errors by action
  • retries by action
  • queue wait by action

Total RPS hides hotspots. Action-level metrics reveal them early.

7.4 Where YiLu Proxy Helps When Routing Hot Paths Create Hidden Risk

One reason weekend hotspots feel “mysterious” is that traffic concentration often happens at the network layer too:

  • one action type suddenly generates more retries
  • retries reuse the same outbound routes
  • the same exit pools get hammered repeatedly
  • downstream rate limits and blocks trigger faster

If your system uses proxies for automation, data collection, or multi-region routing, a weekend spike can quietly turn into:

  • exit contention (too many workers fighting for the same best routes)
  • uncontrolled IP switching (more churn, more retries, more bans)
  • cross-contamination (bulk-like patterns touching sensitive routes)

YiLu Proxy fits naturally here because it lets you separate proxy resources into clear pools under one control plane:

  • keep high-risk or identity-adjacent actions on stable, low-concurrency exits
  • route bulk or bursty weekend actions through separate, high-rotation pools
  • isolate regions explicitly so one region’s weekend surge doesn’t poison routes used elsewhere

Practical use pattern you can copy:

  • POOL_IDENTITY_RESI for login/payment/security-like actions (strict concurrency, sticky sessions)
  • POOL_ACTIVITY_RESI for normal browsing/interactions (moderate concurrency)
  • POOL_BULK_DC for bursty or high-volume weekend tasks (high rotation, capped retries)

This doesn’t magically remove hotspots—but it prevents a routing hotspot from becoming a platform-wide stability issue by keeping traffic types from fighting for the same exits.

If the same microservice collapses every weekend, don’t assume it’s only capacity.

Very often, the real cause is:

  • weekend behavior changes the action mix
  • routing funnels one popular action into a single hot path
  • a fixed dependency becomes the bottleneck

Before adding servers, answer this:
Which user actions are spiking—and where exactly are they being routed?

Once you fix the routing concentration, “capacity problems” often shrink dramatically or disappear.

Post Views: 3

Similar Posts